Kuleba/Zelensky's decision in respect to China will have NATO support am certain, but Ukraine slided DOWN at the NATO decision/trust making headquarters and will not be valued BASED ON ITS SACRIFICE as it should be. Such conduct will also have heavy consequences for best of Ukraine which gives its best to defend one on the front lines. Ukraine is in it for the loss in either case(even if one gets liberated - as it added additional pro Russian factor in the game). Its not only about war in Ukraine and war in Ukraine with Chinese nuclear threats from Belarus CAN'T BE DEFENDED entirely on Ukrainian soil. Zelensky, if you ask me, made million and one mistake.
Mariupol m.f. !!!
REMEMBER YOUR FIRST BETRAYAL !!?????
THEY RETURN OFTEN TIMES IN PLASTIC BAGS EVEN WITHOUT INTERNAL ORGANS.
HOW MANY OF YOU IN RADA EVER SERVED IN THE MILITARY !!???? I AM NOT ASKING ABOUT WHEATHER YOU SERVED ON UKRAINIAN FRONTLINES, BUT REGULAR MILITARY....HOW MANY !!????
WELL, YOU SHOULDN'T BE INSIDE IN THERE IF YOU HAVEN'T. NOT IN THE WAR TIME NOT.
THERE SHOULD BE A PICTURE - A SIGN LIKE THIS INFRONT OF RADA....I WILL NOT ASK YOU WHY WAS NOT THERE AS WAS YOUR JOB TO HAVE ONE DESPLAYED AT THE ENTRANCE, BUT WHERE IS IT !!????
MYBE IF YOU HAD SIGN LIKE THIS AT THE ENTRANCE TO RADA, MORE MEN WOULD VOLUNTEER FOR THE SERVICE AND THOSE ON THE FRONT LINES WOULD DO THEIR JOB EVEN BETTER.
MEN AND LADIES ON THE FRONTLINE(UKRAINE BEST) DESERVE SAME TO DEFEND THEM INSIDE OF THE RADA.
@UKRAINIANS - YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE IN NATO TO BE PART OF THE NATO, BUT YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE SAME MENTALITY AS NATO AND THEY JUST DON'T GET IT. FOR YOU TO HAVE POSITIVE IMPACT FROM NATO, YOU HAVE TO MATCH THEIR VIEWS AS FAR AS NATO NEEDS JUST AS NATO MATCES YOURS. ITS NOT ONE WAY STREET.
EU disputes China claim that it supports Beijing’s proposal to end Ukraine war
- Bloc instead says top diplomat Josep Borrell asked China to ‘use its influence on Russia to contribute to ending’ the armed conflict
Finbarr Berminghamin Brussels
Brussels sources have pushed back against China’s claims that the EU’s top diplomat “attaches great importance” to a Sino-Brazilian statement on ending the war in Ukraine, stating he did not say such a thing.
Josep Borrell met Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi on the margins of an Asean summit in Laos on Friday.
A foreign ministry statement released shortly afterwards said: “The EU attaches importance to the peace initiatives of China and Brazil on the political solution of the Ukrainian crisis.”
Senior EU sources said Borrell did not use those words. A statement from the bloc’s External Action Service later in the day tried to correct the record.
“Josep Borrell asked China to use its influence on Russia to contribute to ending the war,” said the statement, which was published in both English and Chinese.
“He asked China to support the Ukrainian peace process and believed that the joint statement between China and Brazil in May 2024 did not move in this direction,” it added.
The behind-the-scenes pushback highlights the sensitivity of the issue: while Brussels continues to ask for Beijing’s help in ending the war, launched by a Russian military invasion in February 2022, it fears China is moving ever closer to Moscow.
No comments:
Post a Comment