Sunday, December 10, 2023

ROYAL $$$$BOOKS ABOUT HOW TO TREAT YOUR GUT COMING OUT: For I stated you have dealt with mentally ILL people who even searched and search for medical recognition where is none of their business, and through ENFORCEMENT of unethical murderous scumbaggery/theft/rape alike procedures/practices

HEY SCUMBAGS - YOU OWE A LOTS OF MONEY IN STOLEN ONLINE REVENUES IF I ALREADY HAVE TO REJECT AS YOU ACCOMPLISHED VIA STATE EMPLOYMENT AGENCIES THE RIGHT TO WORK. EXPLAIN IN YOUR BOOK HOW IT ALL WORKS AND BASED ON WHICH PRACTICES YOU CAME UP TO SUCH A GREAT CONCLUSIONS.
You bet it was important for Charles and FDA who tested on me a whole line of approved cancer(and blood clots is what they also played on me with) or in some cases even pre approved by FDA psychiatric products - important to cause as many as possible dots on the body to obtain tests based on foods etc. - impact of particular food products on poisoned subject in respect to lymph nodes/gallbladder/ liver/ kidney etc.

@doctor king Charles - perhaps you should publish book for your supporters AS YOU STRESSED YOU WOULD LOVE TO based on butchery you enforced on me for them to live longer more lucrative lives. Don't worry, I wouldn't read one as I hate every second on memory related to captivity spent next to you and yours. Include in your book for people to learn about how to test if eggs are fresh not rotten etc. why farm eggs(show in

book Diane's ford Escort you sold to those farmers you buy eggs from)
are so much better than store eggs and why cooked eggs are healthier than baked etc. Why to eat nettles and how to not burn your tang/mouths hole. And where to pick healing plants to avoid those which could be pissed on in nature and/or even sprayed with poison...MAYBE HOW THROUGH PHYSICAL TORTURE ONE IS SUBJECTED TO, HIS/HER BRAIN CHANGES ITS SHAPE HEH AND CAN BE PROVEN IS MENTALLY ILL...

@BRITISH - IF YOUR KING PUBLICLY CONFESSES WITH OTHER MEMBERS OF YOUR ROYAL BRITISH HOUSE AS SUFFERING FROM MENTAL ILLNESS OR IF YOU BRITISH RECOGNIZE YOUR PRECIOUS SAXE COBURG GOTHA WINDSOR CROWN JEWELS AS IRRESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS DUE TO MENTAL ILLNESS, I WOULD CONSIDER REDUCING THEIR PRISON SENTENCES.


AT FDA A YOUNG HEALTHY HUMAN SUBJECTS ARE ALWAYS NEEDED TO TEST NEW DRUGS. TO QUALIFY, TEST SUBJECTS MUST HAVE SPENT LIFE DRUG FREE, ALCOHOL FREE, NEVER SMOKED, AND IF POSSIBLE WITHOUT CONSUMPTION OF ANY KINDS OF COFFEE PRODUCTS, ARTIFICIAL FOOD/AVERAGES - IN ANOTHER WORDS, THEY SEARCH FOR 100% HEALTHY SUBJECTS WHO ALSO POSES SUPERIOR MENTAL HEALTH. EDUCATED

A +. REWARD WILL BE A LIFE EQUIVALENT TO DEATH WITH HOPEFULLY DEATH OUTCOME VIA ZERO PAY. I KNOW BECAUSE I SOMEHOW DESPITE ALL ODDS IN YUGOSLAVIA MADE IT THROUGH TO BECOME JUST AS STATED ABOVE.

CHARLES ALWAYS WANTED TO BE REMEMBERED BY PEOPLE ABOUT SOMETHING GOOD HE CLAIMED ME OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND HIS WISH THEREFORE ACCORDING TO ONE WAS IS RELEASE OF ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE - HOMEOPATHY BOOK UNDER HIS NAME.

@CHARLES AND CO. - I ALSO HAVE A DREAM. GET YOU PUBLICLY HANGED AT TRAFALGAR SQUARE AS YOU ARE ALL TOGETHER NOT WORTH PISS. SORRY ROPE FOR YOU.



King Charles criticised for appointing pro-homeopathy doctor


Emily Dugan
Sun, 10 December 2023 at 7:52 pm CET·4-min read
Photograph: Oliver Dixon/Shutterstock

King Charles’s appointment of a pro-homeopathy head of the royal medical household has been described as worrying and inappropriate by academics and campaigners.

Dr Michael Dixon, who has championed faith healing and herbalism in his work as a GP, has quietly held the senior position for the last year, the Sunday Times reported.

While Dixon, 71, is head of the royal medical household, for the first time the role is not combined with being the monarch’s physician. Duties include having overall responsibility for the health of the king and the wider royal family – and even representing them in talks with government.

Dixon, who has a penchant for bow ties and a long association with the king, worked in the NHS for almost half a century and is an outspoken advocate of complementary medicine.

He once invited a Christian healer to his surgery to treat chronically ill patients and experimented with prescribing an African shrub called devil’s claw for shoulder pain, as well as horny goat weed for impotence, the Sunday Times reported.

Edzard Ernst, emeritus professor at the University of Exeter, whose work has debunked alternative medicine, said: “Anyone who promotes homeopathy is undermining evidence-based medicine and rational thinking. The former weakens the NHS, the latter will cause harm to society.

“We and others have shown that homeopathy is not an effective therapy, which has today become the accepted consensus. To me, this means its only legitimate place is in the history books of medicine.”


Ernst said “the king can appoint who he wants”, but pointed out that his book on the king’s interest in alternative medicine found that “in the realm of health care, he often seemed to favour people who promote dubious therapies”.

Homeopathic remedies have not been available on prescription since 2017 when NHS England found “no clear or robust evidence to support [their use]”.

Buckingham Palace defended Dixon’s appointment on Sunday, saying “his position is that complementary therapies can sit alongside conventional treatments, provided they are safe, appropriate and evidence based”.

The Good Thinking Society, which promotes scientific scepticism, told the Guardian it was concerned by Dixon’s appointment. Michael Marshall, project director at the society, said: “It isn’t appropriate. I think the role of the monarchy, if it has one in current society, isn’t to be advocating for their own personal projects and their own personal beliefs or using the power and influence they have to further causes that run directly counter to the evidence that we have.

“It’s absolutely unequivocal that homeopathic remedies do not work and just because you happen to be in a position of extreme power and privilege, that doesn’t change that.”

Marshall said the appointment was also worrying because it suggested the king might still be supporting complementary medicine behind the scenes.

He added: “Before Charles became king, he was the patron of homeopathic organisations, he was an outspoken advocate in favour of homeopathy and pushing back the bounds of science towards pseudoscience.

“And the argument was that he would stop doing that once he became king. This appears to be a sign that he isn’t going to do that, that he isn’t going to stop.

“What’s worrying is, as we’ve seen from the black spider memos, Charles is someone who also wields his power and influence quietly behind the scenes as well as publicly, so if this is the kind of step he’s willing to make in public, it raises questions about whether he’s willing to make even more steps in private.”

Graham Smith, chief executive of the campaign group Republic, said: “I think what he’s doing here is risky for the royal family because it throws the spotlight on this aspect of his beliefs that a lot of people wouldn’t be aware of. I think it’s pretty appalling to put someone like that in such a senior high status role … I think we ought to be seeing people put there who are representing real experts in health.”

Smith added: “The whole promotion of alternative medicine undermines the trust in real medicine and I think that putting him in that place is really irresponsible and raises questions about his judgment.”

A Palace spokesperson said: “Dr Dixon is a practising GP; a Fellow of the Royal College of GPs; a fellow of the Royal College of Physicians; former chair of NHS Alliance; former co-chair of the National Social Prescribing Network; former NHS England national clinical champion for social prescribing and the chair of the College of Medicine. He also has an OBE for services to primary care.

“Dr Dixon does not believe homeopathy can cure cancer. His position is that complementary therapies can sit alongside conventional treatments, provided they are safe, appropriate and evidence based.

“As Prince of Wales, the king’s position on complementary therapies, integrated health and patient choice was well documented. In his own words: ‘Nor is it about rejecting conventional medicines in favour of other treatments: the term ‘complementary’ medicine means precisely what it says’.”

Dixon has been approached for comment.

No comments:

Post a Comment