I ESTIMATE 10.000 ADULT ENTERTAINMENT WORKERS WERE INVOLVED IN MK ULTRA - Thai royals had a nasty plan for me with ideas to turn me through life deprivation in absolutely every aspect of life into non existing dust
WITH THAI ROYALS HOSTING MANY OF THEM IN THAILAND.
I would call for NATO intervention on Thailand in respect to Thai royals, but economic investments into neighboring countries would do much greater favor to Thai people who would as a result of those had ability to compare their human rights and quality of life to others in region against whom Thailand is enforcing drug trade/slavery - poverty for the sake of new Siam state which Thai royals believe will create. Thailand in my case was a robbery/theft of life through worse than human slavery for which king Maha Vajiralongkorn insisted was to be used as a form of retaliation against me for whatever set in his sick brain(he wanted a retaliation for own lies and violence used against me through which he believed have with his father and daughters and family managed to produce enough evidence to convict me to death) since I recall one. Thailandese Lucifer whispered in my ears its too late will be too late for me for anything in life due to my age and health, but was wrong.
SATAN HAD HIS HIS OWN MEDALS PINNED TO HIS CHEST ON DISPLAY AND LABELED ME AS MENTALLY IN 2013(BASICALLY HANGED MASK OF DEATH OVER MY MOUTHS) AND CELEBRATED LIFE THROUGH HIS MEDIA WITH HOPE FOR TRUTH TO ROTTEN IN PAIN AND VEIN....THATS HOW THEY DID AND CONTINUE TO DO.
THAILAND HAD AND HAS IN 2023 WORSE DICTATORS ATOP OF HE STATE THAN WHAT SADAM HUSSEIN WAS - THEY ARE MAKING A SELF PROGRESS IN RESPECT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH CONCERNING PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO POINT AT THE ROYAL PRIVATE BANKING ACCOUNTS THESE DAYS, BUT NONE IN RESPECT TO POVERTY IN THAILAND WHICH IS FINANCED THROUGH INVESTMENTS EMBARGO ON NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES.
BRITISH IMBECILE GIGGLED TO MY GENOCIDE WITH OTHERS IN PRESENCE....IT WAS FUNNY TO HIM OBSERVE MY BEING TORTURED AND HAVE DISCUSS WITH OTHERS IN-FRONT OF ME ISSUE AS SEEN HERE.
ONCE THEY LEARNED ABOUT SEVERITY OF MY CASE ON HOW ONE WILL GET TO THE RIGHT TO EXIST ISSUE, THEY STARTED TO PLAY INTERNET PHILOSOPHY ABOUT WHAT THEY ANTICIPATED WILL BE ISSUE OF THE RIGHT TO EXIST FOR ME AS SEEN ON INTERNET - WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE SEEN BELLOW DOESN'T REPRESENT ME IN ANY WAY, BUT MISREPRESENTS MY NEEDS BASED ON WHAT USED TO BE PRINCE CHARLES'S PERSONAL REQUESTS TO GOOGLE AND WIKIPEDIA FOUNDERS. MEETINGS WITH ELITES BEHIND CURTAIN WAS AND IS ESSENTIAL TO THEIR CRIMINAL EXISTENCE. ARTICLE SEEN BELLOW AT WIKIPEDIA IS PHILOSOPHICALLY TWISTED AND TOTALLY UNRELATED TO AVERAGE READER'S NEEDS IF IN QUEST FOR GREATER UNDERSTATING OF PERSONAL DILEMMAS AS PER RIGHT TO EXIST - CONFRONT GENOCIDE...
The right to exist is said to be an attribute of nations. According to an essay by the 19th-century French philosopher Ernest Renan, a state has the right to exist when individuals are willing to sacrifice their own interests for the community it represents. Unlike self-determination, the right to exist is an attribute of states rather than of peoples. It is not a right recognized in international law. The phrase has featured prominently in the Arab–Israeli conflict since the 1950s.
The right to exist of a de facto state may be balanced against another state's right to territorial integrity.[1] Proponents of the right to exist trace it back to the "right of existence", said to be a fundamental right of states recognized by writers on international law for hundreds of years.[2]
Historical use
Thomas Paine (1737–1809) used the phrase "right to exist" to refer to forms of government, arguing that representative government has a right to exist, but that hereditary government does not.[3] In 1823, Sir Walter Scott argued for the "right to exist in the Greek people".[4] (The Greeks were then revolting against Turkish rule.) According to Renan's "What is a Nation?" (1882), "So long as this moral consciousness [called a nation] gives proof of its strength by the sacrifices which demand the abdication of the individual to the advantage of the community, it is legitimate and has the right to exist. If doubts arise regarding its frontiers, consult the populations in the areas under dispute."[5] Existence is not a historical right, but "a daily plebiscite, just as an individual's existence is a perpetual affirmation of life," Renan said.[5] The phrase gained enormous usage in reference to the breakup of the Ottoman Empire in 1918. "If Turkey has a right to exist – and the Powers are very prompt to assert that she has – she possesses an equally good right to defend herself against all attempts to imperil her political existence," wrote Eliakim and Robert Littell in 1903.[6] In many cases, a nation's right to exist is not questioned, and is therefore not asserted.[citation needed]
No comments:
Post a Comment