Friday, January 27, 2023

DUTCH COLONIAL VIOLENCE AND THE MISSING VOICES OF INDONESIANS



The Dutch continue to widely underestimate their colonial violence of the past. The publication of the hard-hitting conclusions of the Independence, Decolonization, Violence and War in Indonesia 1945-1950-program revealed the Dutch state actively condoning systematic and structural violence during Indonesia’s War for Independence. Discourse management, short-term perspectives and diminished Indonesian perspectives explain how Dutch perpetratorship is still under negotiation in the Netherlands.

3 Indonesian veterans (one crying) attend a commemoration ceremony for the victims of the war of independence against the NetherlandsIndonesian veterans commemorate victims of massacres by the Dutch army in the 1940s in 2013. The Indonesian experience of colonial violence is often overlooked in the Netherlands. © Adek Berry / AFP

On February 17, researchers of the Independence, Decolonization, Violence and War in Indonesia 1945-1950 program (IDVWI) presented their results. They concluded that Dutch armed forces structurally and systematically utilised “extreme violence” to stamp out the Republic of Indonesia that had declared itself independent on 17 August 1945. They added that politicians, civilian and military authorities, including their legal systems, looked away, condoned and silenced colonial violence both in Indonesia and The Hague, the Netherlands’ capital city. 

Reactions came fast and furious. Prime minister Mark Rutte apologised to “the people of Indonesia”, but also to Dutch veterans and all the communities violently touched by the war, from 1945 onwards. The displaced Indo-European community feared rehabilitation of those who had forced them from Indonesia. Veterans, in turn, accused researchers of writing about matters they do not understand. 

Yet more commentators, including the Histori Bersama collective,an anti-colonial group that translates publications about the Dutch colonial past, saw a colonial project deliberately phasing out Indonesian voices and victimhood. Theirs was an important observation that connects to a decades-old trend that again reared its head: It is the Dutch tendency to empathise with Dutch experiences, not with those of Indonesians or their revolution. Dutch perpetratorship and violence, then, again needs negotiation.

ESCAPE ROUTES FOR ACCEPTANCE

Why do so many find squarely accepting the violent characteristics of the Netherlands’ colonial past so hard? We identify two main, well-trodden escape routes for acceptance. The first relates to a consistent focus on the 1945-1950 revolutionary period alone. This narrow scope leaves the entire colonial period out, and the idea that only the revolutionary tail-end of Dutch empire proved particularly violent, intact. The other route leading away from acceptance involves the inability of many to countenance Indonesian experiences altogether, whether during the war or before.

Veterans and survivors of Indonesian violence sometimes seem narrowly interested in their experiences as traumatised victims. Such mindsets facilitate phasing out other people’s suffering, which includes Indonesian, Arab and Chinese communities. With it squared away, recognizing perpetratorship seems less necessary or worse, unimportant.

So where do we go from here? While respectful to trauma, we need to open up to the experiences of Indonesians, their rightful resistance and their independence date of 17 August 1945. Only when our memory scripts include how Indonesians for centuries suffered from disenfranchisement, torture, burnings, food scarcity, executions and so on, and the Dutch recognise their resistance as legitimate, can they understand the impacts of Dutch empire fully, and get a grasp on Dutch perpetratorship. It is high time. If not, we tell ourselves half the story. 

NARROW TIME-FRAMES AND LONGUE DURÉE RESISTANCE

The denouement of the Dutch empire in Indonesia between 1945 and 1950 and its aftermaths too often obscure the larger colonial picture. Empire’s tail-end forged Indo-European communities or veterans’ identities as victims of revolt, decolonization and an uncaring government. Scholars turn to the period to study colonialism at its most violent. Likewise, the same time-frame allowed IDVWI researchers to in-depth analyse Dutch armed forces and their actions.

Still, the program’s focus on predominantly Dutch actions and considerations within five war years isolates this revolutionary period from centuries of Dutch oppression and Indonesian resistance before 1945. To larger audiences in particular, leaving out such pre-histories may dampen understandings of just how endemically racist, oppressive and violent Dutch empire had always been. Without such contextualization, for example, apologists or generalists may be encouraged to maintain that between oppression and predation, Dutch colonialism was a force of good, too.

Longue durée perspectives correct this, revealing that outside naked war, too, Dutch violence proved ubiquitous, transgressive and disproportionate. Moreover, beyond military and administrative classes, planters, bankers or ordinary Europeans also benefitted from repression. More so than IDVWI has done, considering the full span of the Dutch subjugation of the archipelago would specifically tease out the ‘colonial mindset’, which, high on superiority and discrimination, discarded the Indonesian thirst for independence as fancy.

More importantly, pre-1945 perspectives highlight how Indonesian individuals, politicians and popular movements had always resisted Dutch domination in realms of representation, law, education and outright confrontation—both domestically and abroad. The revolution, put differently, was no unorganized fluke led by unmoored youths.

Early illustration showing Indonesian slaves pushing a wagon on rails. 3 armed settlers are sitting on a bench placed on the cart.
By focusing only on the revolutionary period from 1945 to 1950, the debate in the Netherlands tends to leave out the entire colonial period and the centuries of Dutch oppression and Indonesian resistance before 1945. Here a drawing showing Dutch settlers and their Indonesian slaves.

THE LIMITS OF “ EXTREME VIOLENCE”  

The need for broader perspectives harks back to the equally broad conceptual catch-all that IDVWI has employed: ‘extreme violence’. The programme adopted the term to work with the issue of war crimes. Their invocation could slow down researchers with juridical frameworks whereas they set out to explain Dutch violence. War crimes would also exclude perpetration by militias. ‘Extreme violence’, conversely, would leave researchers free to chart all sorts of misdeeds. 

Such a choice could hamper the much-needed societal familiarisation with Dutch perpetratorship. Due to its broad nature, ‘extreme violence’ could seem yet another euphemism. The term could connote that if ‘extreme violence’ was transgressive, many other forms of Dutch violence were unproblematic, or not worth studying. Regardless, ‘extreme violence’ as a tool, and with its twin ‘accepted violence’ in tow, is perhaps less useful to unpack Indonesian experiences.

To villagers whose houses had been razed and whose friends or livestock lay dead, it did not matter much whether indiscriminate fire or an exchange between two regular army units had caused this. What was so specifically ‘extreme’ about Dutch violence during 1945-1950, apart from its scale? As journalist Piet Hagen recently stated: in Indonesia, “five centuries of violence lie between the arrival of the first colonists in 1509 and the departure of the Dutch in 1950”, which also included Portuguese, French, British, and Japanese violence. 

MAKING VIOLENCE HUMANITARIAN

Truncated time-lines of violence also potentially keep open the second escape route for those resisting Dutch perpetratorship and considering Indonesian perspectives. Some news outlets tend to allow agenda-setters to steer discussion away from casting Dutch troops as aggressors. Many journalists invariably ask ‘how bad was Dutch violence’, to which only veterans respond. This trend of blocking out other voices reflects national, colonial thought-patterns that refuse to go away: Indonesian suffering is second to Dutch suffering. Through such thinking, Dutch violence is reduced and placed on par with Indonesian violence, as if the two are invariably the same.

Part of the public debates before and after the release of the program’s findings reflect this. The article entitled ‘It was War. What should We have Done Then?’ (NRC, 19 February 2022) is exemplary. In it, an Indo-European survivor of Indonesian violence against anything colonial recalls his experiences during the infamous Bersiap period of the Indonesian national revolution which lasted roughly from August 1945 to early 1946. He relates how he and his family escaped from being “slaughtered” along with “thousands of Dutch and Indo-Dutch, Chinese and Indonesians suspected of ‘collaboration’ [with the Dutch]”.

Although we fully recognize the importance of the man’s experiences, his memories figure in an article deliberately devoid of Indonesian experiences or historical origins of the revolution. Instead, two Dutch Veterans Institute spokespeople are quoted at length as they diminish Dutch violence: “only a minority” of troops, they claim, committed atrocities; often they avenged comrades whom Indonesians had killed “in horrible ways”. Better still, some “military units really just completed a humanitarian mission”. 

RELATIVISING AND JUSTIFYING DUTCH ATROCITIES

The selective, biased message is clear: while the downright attractive script of Dutch liberators is elaborated upon, Indonesians as political actors and victims of colonial warfare are unimportant. Only one Indonesian commentator speaks, but notdirectly on Indonesian experiences.

Other interest groups entrench this thinking. The Dutch Indische Federation (FIN), an interest-group for the Indo-Europeans who often forcibly left Indonesia for the Netherlands, takes this to another level. It translates its laudable objective to protect the memories of these displaced ‘Indische communities’, into a hard-nosed refusal to see Indonesians as anything other than rebels against Dutch authority. 

The FIN, too, claims Dutch forces were sent to Indonesia to conduct a humanitarian mission. This misinterpretation of facts is one thing; worse is that they wish to derail any discussion that veers towards Dutch perpetratorship. Politicising the circa 6.000 Bersiap-deaths caused by Indonesians, they attempt to criminalize what they call ‘Bersiap-denial’. Taking their cue from the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s Holocaust denial working definition, the FIN seems to take to court those who seemingly diminish the meaning of the Bersiap. Needless to say, such steps restrict open debate on the complex topic of Dutch culpability and victimhood. 

Remarkably, this ex post facto relativising and justifying Dutch atrocities is seemingly similar to 1945-1950 narratives, the very narratives scholars Remco Raben and Peter Romijn have analysed for IDVWI. Responsible authorities, they state, worked hard to defend Dutch violence, going so far as to obscure from inquiries. In this sense, not much has changed.

THROUGH THE LENS OF TODAY: THE ROAD FORWARD

If anything, the discussions around the IDVWI results show that the Dutch, even beyond the understandably hyper-interested FIN and veterans, are still ill-equipped to deal with the Netherlands as a perpetrator nation in the Indonesian archipelago. The same commentators – veterans and other revisionist apologists among them – again stepped into that void to declare Indonesian experiences unimportant, unless they substantiate and validate Dutch suffering. 

They tried to keep this old trend alive by undermining IDVWI’s findings. They openly questioned the programs’ integrity, saying they deliberately applied modern standards to history. Put simply, ‘anti-colonial’ researchers had passed judgement on politicians, administrators and soldiers’ actions and decisions well before setting foot in the archives. No wonder ‘extreme violence’ was the ultimate verdict, they said. A quick Tweet to the same effect by Pieter van Vollenhoven, a member of the Dutch Royal House, lent a further sheen of respectability to these revisionist, colonial ways of thinking.

Not only are these attempts at whitewashing informed by fallacious reasoning – likewise, did we not all agree that slavery was a crime against humanity and needs to be studied from that vantage-point? – nor will the program’s findings go away. They will force the renegotiation of Dutch stories of victimhood in Indonesia into a simultaneous acceptance of perpetratorship. The results, after all, incontrovertibly showed that ‘extreme violence’ was used across the board, even if the concept itself may be a tad fuzzy.

Still, many accounts need settling. Foremost, Indonesia’s 17 August 1945 independence date needs to be formally recognized if the Netherlands wants to signal recognition of Dutch violence and Indonesian suffering in the name of independence. For now, the one-sided Dutch date is still 27 December 1949, when the kingdom ‘transferred’ sovereignty to Indonesia. Rutte’s apology said nothing about reparations to the victims of Dutch violence, nor about the billions Indonesia was forced to pay the Netherlands at the end of the conflict. Indonesian scholars and former politicians wondered about these issues, too. If the Netherlands truly wants to account for past transgressions, its narratives of victimhood must be considered alongside its perpetratorship. This means including visible Indonesian experiences to the Dutch National Remembrance Day on 4 May, when the Netherlands commemorates all war casualties of the long Second World War.








BLOG DOWNLOAD UPDATED ON SEPTEMBER JANUARY 30TH, 2023

YOU CAN SHARE MY BLOG THE AUSER TIMES ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, BUT WITHOUT PERMISSION TO MODIFY ANY OF MY CONTENT OR CHARGE FOR ANY OT ITS CONTENT

You can FREELY post and share for free anywhere in the world, but without the right to charge for content or modify blog posts(or to add whatever is not mine to one) in any way. With my being cut even from healthcare for which mother is paying out of her own pocket to look legitimate as possible(with so many royals writing their own memoirs for so many years already without releasing single one), I figured out is in my best interest to share here seen with you world.

BLOG DOWNLOAD:

Download this blog







END




 GERMANS DEMANDED A WAR BETWEEN MYSELF AND PARENTS - CLAIMED ME NOTHING IN RESPECT TO HUMAN RIGHTS I CITE, "NOTHING IN RESPECT TO ASSISTANCE TO YOU TILL YOU CONDEMN AND DISTANCE YOURSELF AWAY FROM PARENTS AS WE WILL NOT SUPPORT SOMEONE WHO IS UNSURE ABOUT WHO THOSE CLEARLY RUINED AND CONTINUE TO RUIN ONE'S LIFE...EITHER YOU OR PARENTS, BUT NOT BOTH".....

FIRST SLOVENIAN PRESIDENT INVOLVED IN CRIME MILAN KUČAN HAD TO ATTEND ENGLISH SPEAKING CLASSES TO MATCH SOMEWHAT CAPABILITIES OF OTHERS WHO ATTENDED MEETINGS IN SLOVENIA....NOW KING CHARLES MADE UNCONDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR ONE ANOTHER AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF PUTIN WITH KUČAN IN 1998.


CRIME ON BEHALF OF PUTIN WENT ON VIA KUČAN ALL THE WAY THROUGH SEVERAL PRESIDENTS ENDING WITH BORUT PAHOR AND NEXT NATAŠA PIRC MUSAR - KUČAN MENTORED BOTH, BUT OPPOSITION FROM KUČAN SUCH AS JANŠA/PETERLE WAS EVEN WORSE - MORE CORRUPT...MORE MURDEROUS IN FORM OF MISLEADING PUBLIC ON OPPOSITION ISSUES WHILE USING EXACTLY SAME KUČAN TACTICS - METHODS.

CRIME UNDER BORUT PAHOR WENT INTO HOSPITALISATION OF FATHER INTO EXTREME WHICH WAS USED TO REPLIACTE UPON MY RETURN FROM POLAND FATHER'S FUTURE ISSUE DEMONSTRATED TO ME UNDER MK ULTRA TORTURE WHEN SLOVENIAN GOVERNMENT BEGUN TO CONDITION ME VIA FORCED LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT FUTURE INABILITY TO PAY BILLS...WAS FURTHER USED TO DETER ME FROM PERSUING POSSIBLE EMPLOYMENT AS TO BRAINWASH WHICH DEMANDED FROM ME TO RATHER BECOME FATHER'S HOME CARER THAN JOB FOR SAME AMMOUNT OF MONEY AND TO FURTHER DRIVE ME INSANE VIA ISSUES WHICH PSYCHITRISTS AND POLICE HAVE USED FATHER FOR PRACTICALLY ON HIS DEAD BED WITH IDEA TO OBTAIN ANY RECATIONS  OR STATEMENS FROM ME WHICH WOULD GIVE THEM THE ABILITY TO PREVENT MY INVESTIGATION OF SLOVENIAN POLICE INVOLVED IN CRIME PROCEDURE.
Prince Charles(now king Charles) BAGGED OUT LOUD AMERICAN ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND OVER AND OVER TO PLEASE PLLLLEEEEAAASSSEEEEE NOT RELEASE CRIME THROUGH MEDIA BEFORE HIS CORONATION https://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2023/01/prince-charlesnow-king-bagged-out-loud.html


DEAD END WAS GUARANTEED TO ME AS A OUTCOME BY SEVERAL BRITISH PHYSICIANS AND PRINCE CHARLES BACK IN 2017 - A FUNNY GERMAN COMEDY FULL OF HOPE AND CURSE - THE DRAMA WRITTEN BY HOUSE OF SAXE COBURG GOTHA WINDSOR THAT REPEATED ITSELF YET AGAIN - I call it a simple Euro guide as per what is expected of average "European"(IT REALLY IS A GERMAN NEONAZISM ALL OVER AGAIN - RELOADED)...

BRITISH EVALUATED AND REPEATEDLY ESTIMATED WHAT WOULD AND SHOULD WITH CERTAINITY RESULT IN GUARANTEED IN MY FACE DEATH ALREADY 6 MONTHS ACCORDING TO PRINCE CHARLES AND HIS PHYSICIANS BEFORE THE END OF THE ORDEAL EXPIRATION DATE http://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2023/01/prince-charlesnow-king-bagged-out-loud.html  - THESE BRITISH PHYSICIANS REPEATED ME(ONE INDIVIDUAL WHO ALSO REMINDED ON AMERICAN NEIGHBOR NEXT DOOR FROM MIAMI BEACH WITH EXTRA WEIGHT AND PERHAPS EVEN A BEARD WAS ENTHUSIAST WHO WORKED ON MENTIONED PROJECT FOR ABOUT 10 YEARS AHEAD OF AS POINTED OUT HERE)  WHAT THEY CLAIMED WERE RESULTS OBTAINED BASED ON PROVIDED FOOD USED UNDER MK ULTRA AND WHICH I WOULD HAVE TO DEAL WITH IN REAL TIME - HAVE ESTABLISHED THROUGH EVALUATION CIRCUS IN MY FACE WHICH WENT ON UNDER MK ULTRA FOR AT LEAST FIVE IF NOT MORE YEARS(SINCE 2011) HOW CONNECTING CANCER


DOTS DURING MK ULTRA SESSIONS TO FOOD PRODUCTS USED, WOULD PRODUCE FOR ME IN REAL TIME VIA FOOD ENFORCED THROUGH SLOVENIAN STATE IN REAL TIME BEGINING 2017 A DEFINITE DEATH OUTCOME 6 MONTHS BEFORE AS THEY REFERED TO CRIME "GAME END". THATS WHEN AND HOW IT ALL STARTED IN 

.DURING MENTIONED OCCASION IN 2017, NOW KING CHARLES GOT FROM ME VIA PROVOCATIONS A DESIRED QUESTION AS PER WHEN IT WILL ALL START(GOT QUESTION OUT OF ME AFTER HE EXPLAINED ME A MISERABLE SLOW CANCEROUS DEATH) ON WHAT I GOT SADISTIC LAUGHING AS AN ANSWER STATING ME IN FACE I CITE, "RIGHT NOW...FROM THIS MOMENT ON...ACTIVATED" LOCATION WHERE STATED INCIDENT WITH AS PROMISED DEADLY OUTCOME, TOOK PLACE INSIDE OF OUR KITCHEN AREA NEAR STOVE WHILE STANDING UP - AGAIN AFTER WEEK OF RESTLESS TORTURE(THEY TORTURED TWO WEEKS WITHOUT REST ON WHAT TORTURE STOPPED FOR ABOUT WEEK AND IT WAS RESTARDED FOR ANOTHER SLEEPLESS MK ULTRA WALK IN TEH SLEEP WEEEK DURING WHICH CHARLES ACTIVATED MENTIONED ISSUE TO BE 100% EXACT).

BRITISH RESERVED THEMSELVES NEXT TO ALL CRIME IMPLEMENTED AGAINST ME IN SLOVENIA, POLAND, CZECH REP. SLOVAKIA ALSO THE RIGHT TO MURDER THROUGH 100% CONTROL OF FOOD IMPLEMENTATION...

OUTCOME IS THE SAME, BUT WHICH SIDE WOULD YOU LIKE TO TAKE ANYWAYS !!?????


@KING CHARLES, PRINCE WILLIAM, PRINCE HARRY, ANDREW - HOPE AND NOT DEATH(forget about hate) FOR HUMANITY !!! AM I RIGHT !!????


THIS IS HOW gREAT BRITAIN DOES IT THROUGH UNITED NATIONS AND OTHER ORGANISATIONS TO GAIN MORE AND MORE GLOBAL ATTENTION - A PRESTIGE EVEN INFLUENCE IF YOU LIKE...THATS HOW AND BY WHOM IT WAS DONE IN MY CASE.





WORLD NEVER GOT ENOUGH OF LIE....STILL RUNNING STRONG AND IN NEED TO FORGET THROUGH REJECT(80 YEARS AGO)...


MENTAL HEALTH EXPERTS....
 

Tuesday, December 27, 2022






ITS NOT A JOURNALISM YOU SUPPORT WHEN YOU PAY MONEY TO GUARDIAN ALIKE NEWSPAPERS - YOU SUPPORT EXACTLY WHAT YOU SEE ON HERE AND ONE IS KNOWN AS SAW NOTHING, HEARD NOTHING, KNOW NOTHING...AT GUARDIAN AND OTHER NEWS OUTLETS, A NEWS IS USED TO COVER-UP TRUTH WITH PAID BY PATRONS ARTICLES AND GOVERNMENT AGENDA AND MOST OF THE TIME WITH PREFABRICATED STORIES IN WHICH THEY INVOLVE WHATEVER GOVERNMENTS THINK IS MOST CONVENIENT FOR SOCIETY(PATRONS PATRONS)
WORLD OF BULLSHIT, LIES, AND DEMENTIA NOT JOURNALISM....ALMOST EVERY CNN JOURNALIST, GUARDIAN, EXPRESS UK, L.A. TIMES, NEW YORK TIMES, FINANCIAL TIMES ETC. FROM USA TO INDIA AND BEYOND VISITED THIS HOUSE WHERE MK ULATR CRIME ROARED FOR NO LESS THAN 28 YEARS - THEY DEDICATED ZERO PUBLIC ATTENTION TO CRIME OF MILLENNIUM. WORSE THAN KREMLIN'S PROPAGANDA AND WORSE THAN WHAT STALIN HAD. KILLERS NOT JOURNALISTS. THEY ALL WERE BROUGHT BY ELITES SUCH AS BRITISH ROYALS I CITE, "HE, SHE WILL HELP YOU WITH LALALA"....THEY ALL LEFT WITH NOTHING WE CAN DO FOR YOU AND MORE TORTURE WENT ON, THE LESS THEY WERE CAPABLE TO DO FOR ME IS WHAT THEY CONTINUED TO CLAIM SO JOE BIDENS COULD FUEL AMERICAN PUBLIC WITH CAUSE FOR WHOM EVERYONE KNEW WAS A FAKE CASE GOVERNMENT MADE CRIME AGAINST SINGLE INDIVIDUAL(making of the nazi which black community specially embraced due to as their leaders claimed me was a necessity for their portion of society to remain protected - it wasn't all about corruption contracts etc. which they received through this case, but as they claimed also about black social justice) SO ELON MUSKS COULD FREELY JIGGLE WITH FREE CASH AND SO FUTURE WAR IN UKRAINE WOULDN'T HAVE OPPONENTS AGAINST ONE....28 YEARS INDEED.





ONLINE PORN CAN BE DATING IN ROOM WITH 1500 PEOPLE(if your device is designed to cast all over the internet as Harry claimed me case will be) AND ACCORDING TO BRITISH ROYALS FUNNNNN  https://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2023/01/slovenian-psychiatric-police-shithead.html ....
MK ULTRA MURDER NOT EVEN TORTURE JUST A JOKE FOR SELECTED "CANCEL CULTURE" FEW ;) AND "WE THE MENTAL HEALTH EXPERTS" DO IT AT HUMAN RIGHTS AWARDS BECAUSE "WE CAN"




FIRST TORTURE INVOLVING BLEACHING ISSUES IN CLOSED HOUSE AREA I RECALL WAS DONE IN BELARUS AND GOES BACK AS FAR AS TO 1998. HERE MENTIONED ISSUE WAS EXPLOITED MORE THAN WHAT I ANTICIPATED - MOLD KILLING "CANCEL CULTURE" FOR WHICH WAS CLAIMED TO ME WILL BE DONE TO BRING EUROPEAN UNION AND USA ON THE SAME STATE CRIME LEVEL AS TO WHAT WAS USSR, SO SYSTEMS COULD MERGE EASIER - IT APPEARED VLADIMIR PUTIN PURCHASED CRIME VIA LONDON AND WAS EXTRA ADDED TO BRITISH OIL/MINERAL TRADE CONTRACTS(inked in red)....EUSSR AND AS MEDVEDEV STATED, SOON(as soon as death certificate is issued to me) A BRITISH RETURN TO EU.


TORTURE AS THEY ALONE HAVE REFERRED TO BUTCHERY REALLY WAS A KILLING BASED ON HUMAN CANCER EXPERIMENTAION https://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2023/01/as-i-was-doing-first-time-in-my-life.html 

CRIME AGAINST ME IS AT THIS STAGE COMPLETE - 1-800 LONDON CABAL(FINACIERS OF VIOLENT SHITHEADS) DIDN'T EXERCISE ANY OTHER SIGNIFCANT MK ULTRA RELATED CRIMES BEYOND CAR MOLD


ISSUES...ONE RAN OUT OF CRIME https://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2023/01/slovenian-psychiatric-police-shithead.html THEY DIDN'T DENY ME ONLY HEALTH EXAMINATION RELATED TO CANCER/THROMBOSIS AT THE GENERAL HOSPITAL IN NOVO MESTO IN 2022 - IN 2013 AFTER HOSPITALIZING ME INTO PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL WHERE TORTURED, THEY DENIED ME THE RIGHT TO SECOND OPINION, DENIED TO THE RIGHT TO COURT, DENIED THE RIGHT TO ATTORNEY AND HAVE USED DEFENSE ATTORNEYS WHICH THEY ASSIGNED ME FOR TORTURE - NOT ONLY TO MISREPRESENT LIES AGAINST ME AND UPGRADE THEM INTO EVEN BIGGER LIES FALSE ACCUSATIONS, BUT BEFORE BEING ASSIGNED TO ME TO DESTROY ME THEY WERE ENGAGING EVEN INTO PHYSICAL TORTURE VIA PROCEDURE KNOWN AS MK ULTRA....SIMPLY ANIMALS AND THE ULTIMATE TRUTH ABOUT SO-CALLED SLOVENIA.




People from around the world used to call me VOODOO DOLL WITH REAL HAITIAN AND AFRICAN VOODOOS ALSO INVOLVED(upgraded at the British palaces into WILD PETER beginning in 2011 as royals begun to refer me as) https://ausertimes.blogspot.com/2023/01/people-from-around-world-used-to-call.html


No comments:

Post a Comment